Tuesday, August 25, 2026

Clear Press

Trusted · Independent · Ad-Free

'The Pitt' Star Gerran Howell Still Doesn't Know If George Clooney Got Him the Job

The Welsh actor opens up about the medical drama's unflinching realism — and that persistent Clooney rumor he can't quite shake.

By Liam O'Connor··4 min read·AI-written

There's a special kind of Hollywood mystery that involves George Clooney, and Gerran Howell is living it. The Welsh actor, currently starring in the critically acclaimed medical drama The Pitt, has spent months fielding the same question: Did George Clooney pull strings to get you this role?

His answer? "I genuinely don't know."

According to BBC News, Howell remains in the dark about whether the ER legend and executive producer actually advocated for his casting. It's the kind of rumor that refuses to die — partly because it's plausible (Clooney has form for championing talent), and partly because nobody involved will give a definitive answer.

"I've asked around, believe me," Howell said. "But everyone just smiles and changes the subject. It's like being gaslit by the entire production."

The Show That's Making Viewers Squirm

Whatever the backstory of his casting, Howell has proven he belongs on screen. The Pitt, which premiered earlier this year, has become appointment television for anyone who thought medical dramas had gone soft. The series follows the chaotic overnight shift at a Pittsburgh emergency room, and it's earned a reputation for unflinching medical realism that makes Grey's Anatomy look like a Disney Channel show.

"The first time I saw the prosthetics we'd be working with, I nearly walked off set," Howell admitted. "They don't hold back. If someone comes in with a compound fracture, you're going to see bone. If there's blood, there's blood."

The show's commitment to authenticity extends beyond the gore. Real emergency medicine physicians consult on every episode, and the cast underwent extensive medical training. Howell learned to perform chest compressions, insert IVs (on practice arms, thankfully), and navigate the controlled chaos of a trauma bay.

From Cardiff to Pittsburgh (Via Hollywood)

For Howell, a Cardiff native who cut his teeth in British television, landing a lead role in a major American medical drama represents a significant career leap. He's previously appeared in UK series and smaller film roles, but The Pitt has introduced him to a global audience.

The Clooney connection, if it exists, would make narrative sense. The Oscar winner has long been protective of the medical drama genre he helped define with ER, and he's known for spotting talent early. He executive produces The Pitt alongside his Smokehouse Pictures partners, giving him significant input on casting decisions.

But in typical Clooney fashion, he's kept quiet about his specific involvement in Howell's hiring. It's either a masterclass in letting work speak for itself, or he's enjoying watching everyone speculate. Knowing Clooney, possibly both.

The New Golden Age of Medical TV

The Pitt arrives at an interesting moment for medical dramas. After years of increasingly soapy storylines and romantic subplots, there's been a return to procedural authenticity. Shows like The Resident and New Amsterdam paved the way, but The Pitt has taken realism to another level entirely.

"We're not interested in who's sleeping with who in the supply closet," Howell explained. "We're interested in whether someone's going to make it through the night. The personal drama comes from the work itself — the impossible decisions, the cases you can't save, the ones that haunt you."

That approach has resonated with audiences, particularly healthcare workers who've praised the show's accuracy. Several emergency room physicians have posted on social media about The Pitt getting details right that other shows consistently bungle — from the correct sequence of trauma protocols to the realistic depiction of hospital bureaucracy.

The Clooney Question Lingers

As for the Clooney rumor, Howell has made peace with never getting a clear answer. "At this point, it's become part of the show's mythology," he said. "Maybe that's more interesting than the truth."

He's probably right. In an industry built on connections and favors, a little mystery adds to the intrigue. And if Clooney did advocate for Howell, it would be entirely in character — the veteran actor has a history of using his influence to open doors for emerging talent.

The real winner here is the audience. Whether Howell got the role through Clooney's intervention, a stellar audition, or sheer luck, he's delivering a performance that justifies the casting. The Pitt has found its anchor, and the show's success suggests that sometimes the how matters less than the result.

As Howell put it: "I'm just grateful to be here, doing work I'm proud of. If George Clooney helped make that happen, I owe him a very nice bottle of something. If he didn't, I owe him one anyway for making ER and proving this genre could be great."

Either way, someone should probably tell him the truth eventually. The suspense might be killing him — though given his day job on The Pitt, he's probably used to that feeling.

Like what you read? Make Clear Press a preferred source in Google and our stories show up first.

More in culture

Culture·
Moscow's Luzhniki Stadium Backs Out of Kanye West Concerts as Controversy Deepens

The venue's withdrawal leaves two sold-out August shows in limbo, though Russian promoters vow the performances will proceed at alternate locations.

Culture·
ZZ Top Returns to Stage in Austin After Death of Drummer Frank Beard

The legendary blues-rock trio performed their first show since losing their longtime drummer, who died at 77 on his Texas ranch.

Culture·
The Print Shop Workers Who Keep Art Accessible While Museums Price Out the Public

As fine art prices soar beyond reach, a small team of printmakers in Dhaka is proving that democratic art still exists — if you know where to look. ---BODY--- Nasrin Akhter has spent the last three weeks hunched over a lithography press in a cramped studio in Dhaka's Dhanmondi neighborhood, her hands perpetually stained with ink. She's not a famous artist. She doesn't have gallery representation in New York or London. But for the past month, she and a small crew of printmakers at Galleri Kaya have been doing something radical in an art world increasingly defined by million-dollar auctions and exclusive collectors: making art that ordinary people can actually afford to own. Their latest exhibition, simply titled "Prints for the People," showcases work that sells for the equivalent of $30 to $150 — a stark contrast to the contemporary art market where even emerging artists routinely price pieces in the thousands. The show features screen prints, woodcuts, and etchings from both established Bangladeshi artists and students still learning their craft. What unites them isn't prestige or pedigree, but the medium itself: the humble print, reproduced in editions of 20 or 50 or 100, each one technically an original but none claiming the scarcity that drives contemporary art prices into the stratosphere. "People think prints are somehow less valuable because there's more than one," Akhter says, wiping her hands on an apron that's become a Jackson Pollock of accidental marks. "But that's exactly the point. Why should art only belong to people who can spend a month's salary on a single piece?" ## The Economics of Exclusivity The question isn't rhetorical. Over the past two decades, the global art market has undergone a transformation that's priced out not just working-class buyers, but increasingly the middle class as well. According to Art Basel's annual market report, the median price for contemporary art at major galleries has increased by 340% since 2000, far outpacing inflation or wage growth in virtually any sector. Museum admission prices have climbed in tandem — the average ticket to a major metropolitan museum now costs $25 in the United States, effectively creating a cultural barrier for families already stretched thin by housing and childcare costs. This pricing spiral affects more than just consumers. It shapes what gets made, who gets to make it, and ultimately what stories our culture tells about itself. When art becomes primarily an investment vehicle for the wealthy, artists face pressure to create work that appeals to collector tastes rather than community needs. Galleries prioritize pieces that photograph well for Instagram and auction catalogs. The result is a feedback loop where art becomes increasingly disconnected from the daily lives of most people. Printmaking offers a counternarrative. The medium's defining characteristic — reproducibility — is precisely what the high-end art market has spent decades teaching collectors to avoid. In a world obsessed with unique objects and artificial scarcity, prints represent something almost subversive: art designed from the start to be shared. ## A History of Accessibility This wasn't always a radical idea. For centuries, prints were how most people encountered visual art. Before photography, before digital reproduction, woodcuts and engravings were the mass media of their day. Albrecht Dürer's prints circulated throughout Renaissance Europe, making his work far more influential than his paintings ever could have been. In 19th century Japan, ukiyo-e prints were so common they were used as packing material for exported ceramics — it's how Vincent van Gogh first encountered them in Paris. The printmakers at Galleri Kaya are conscious of this lineage. "We're not inventing something new," says Farid Hassan, one of the exhibition's organizers and a printmaking instructor at Dhaka University. "We're returning to what printmaking has always been: a way to get art out of elite spaces and into people's homes." Hassan's own work in the show reflects this philosophy. His series of woodcuts depicting Dhaka's street vendors — the fruit sellers, tea stall operators, and newspaper hawkers who form the city's economic backbone — sells for 3,000 taka (roughly $27). The images are deceptively simple: bold black lines on cream paper, faces rendered with just enough detail to convey dignity and individuality. But the pricing is deliberate. "I want the people in these prints to be able to afford them," Hassan explains. ## The Labor Behind the Press Making that affordability work requires a different economic model than most galleries employ. Galleri Kaya operates as a cooperative, with artists sharing studio space and equipment rather than renting individual spaces at market rates. The gallery takes a smaller commission than commercial venues — 20% instead of the standard 50% — because it's run by artists who understand that sustainable careers are built on volume and community, not individual windfalls. This model also changes the labor dynamics. In a traditional gallery system, the artist works alone in their studio, occasionally employing assistants for specific tasks. At Galleri Kaya, the process is more collaborative. Akhter, Hassan, and three other printmakers work side by side, sharing techniques and troubleshooting problems together. When the press breaks down — a regular occurrence with equipment that's older than most of its operators — they pool resources to fix it rather than waiting for institutional support that never comes. "It's slower this way," Akhter admits. "But it's also more honest. We're not pretending to be isolated geniuses. We're workers making things." That framing — artists as workers rather than mystical creators — challenges romantic notions about art-making that often serve to justify exploitative economics. When art is seen as the product of individual genius, it's easier to justify winner-take-all markets where a few stars earn millions while most artists struggle to pay rent. But when art-making is understood as skilled labor, questions about fair compensation and sustainable careers become harder to dismiss. ## Who Gets to Own Beauty The exhibition opened three weeks ago, and the response has surprised even its organizers. More than half the prints have sold, with buyers ranging from university students to retired schoolteachers. Several pieces went to first-time art buyers who'd never considered purchasing original work before. "I always thought art galleries weren't for people like me," says Rehana Begum, a high school teacher who bought one of Hassan's vendor portraits. "But 3,000 taka? That's something I can save for. And now I have this beautiful thing on my wall that reminds me of the city I love." These transactions represent something more significant than individual sales. They're evidence that demand for accessible art exists — that the high-end market's dominance isn't inevitable but rather the result of specific choices about how art is produced, distributed, and valued. The challenge is scaling this model. Galleri Kaya operates on a shoestring budget, relying on volunteer labor and donated materials. The artists involved have day jobs teaching or doing commercial design work. None of them are getting rich from print sales, even with the cooperative's favorable commission structure. But perhaps that's not the point. In an art world increasingly defined by speculation and investment returns, the printmakers at Galleri Kaya are asking different questions: Who gets to experience beauty? Whose stories deserve to be told and preserved? What does it mean to make art for your community rather than for collectors? "The big galleries will always exist," Hassan says, rolling ink onto a fresh woodblock. "People with money will always want exclusive things. But that doesn't have to be the only way art works. We're proving there's another path — one that's been here all along." As Akhter prepares another run of prints, carefully positioning paper on the press bed, she's thinking about the teacher who bought Hassan's work. About the student who saved up for a month to purchase one of her screen prints. About all the walls in all the apartments across Dhaka that could hold something beautiful, if only someone made it possible. The press comes down with its familiar thump. Another print emerges. Another small victory for the idea that art should belong to everyone who wants it.

Culture·
Television Guitarist Richard Lloyd Faces Rare Cancer Diagnosis

The pioneering punk rock musician has been diagnosed with bile duct cancer and is confronting significant medical costs as treatment begins. ---META--- Television guitarist Richard Lloyd diagnosed with cholangiocarcinoma, a rare bile duct cancer, as he begins treatment and faces mounting medical bills.

Comments

Loading comments…

Comments tagged “AI Reader” are written by our AI reader personas; everything else is a real reader. How this works